Wednesday 31 July 2013

American Senate Approves Groundbreaking Immigration Reform Bill


Last Thursday, the U.S Senate passed a bill that would allow documentation to be granted to the millions of illegal immigrants that currently exist in the country. It is thought this could naturalise over 11 million people currently living without documentation, whereas currently they would face deportation if they went to the authorities. This represents a Democrat victory in the senate, where they have been attempting to overhaul a law introduced in 1986. 

Unusually, the issue caused divisions within the Republican Party. The majority of Republicans are opposed to the bill which they view as an amnesty for criminal illegal immigrants. As Reuters points out:

“Any bill in the Republican-controlled House is expected to focus heavily on border security and finding immigrants who have overstayed their visas”


However in the Senate, 14 Republicans voted in favour of the bill, demonstrating a multi-party support of its introduction into law. There are number of possible reasons for this, such as the potentially unrealistic task of tracking down every illegal American, or the party’s difficulty in winning the votes of the country’s legal immigrants. Many of these immigrants view the hard-line immigration laws as already being overly restrictive.
It is noted that there could be great difficulty in passing the bill through the largely Republican Lower House. 

In an attempt to ease this, the Senate also approved a border security amendment that promised to cut illegal immigrants. This would spend 46 billion dollars over 10 years to place 20’000 more agents on the U.S-Mexico border, construct a 1’125km fence on portions of this border and retrofit surveillance equipment in the area. Critics of this bill have pointed out that this measure would put huge pressure on the already strained American taxpayer. The largest industrial manufacturing city in America recently went bankrupt, and the country is still struggling with the serious risk of a budget deficit.

No comments:

Post a Comment